16-10-24 (a) describes the elements of misdemeanor obstruction of a 222, 535 S.E.2d 269 (2000); McLeod v. State, 245 Ga. App. Gordon v. State, 337 Ga. App. Meeker v. State, 282 Ga. App. An officer had probable cause to arrest a defendant for public drunkenness and for obstruction of a police officer. Reynolds v. State, 280 Ga. App. 3, 243 S.E.2d 289 (1978). 681, 747 S.E.2d 688 (2013); Harper v. State, 337 Ga. App. 725 (1915). English v. State, 257 Ga. App. McMullen v. State, 325 Ga. App. 607, 602 S.E.2d 327 (2004); Monas v. State, 270 Ga. App. 35, 684 S.E.2d 108 (2009). 486, 672 S.E.2d 459 (2009). Web16-10-24(b) - willful obstruction of law enforcement officers by use of threats or violence - f 16-10-24(a) - willful obstruction of law enforcement officers - m: din: x0057861 name: hendry, dennis calvin birth date: 04/11/1973 race: b Fricks v. State, 210 Ga. App. 16-10-24(a) and fleeing or attempting to elude in violation of O.C.G.A. 16-10-24, was proper because in both the similar transaction and the incident leading to the charges being tried, the defendant was arrested in possession of cocaine and "sale-sized" baggies after seeking to avoid police; the trial court also gave an instruction that the similar transaction evidence was limited to the purpose of showing the defendant's bent of mind in committing the charged offenses. There was sufficient evidence to support convictions for felony obstruction of a law enforcement officer; disobeying the officer's lawful commands to wait and to back off constituted a misdemeanor violation under O.C.G.A. - Defendant failed to show that the charge against defendant for obstructing an officer by becoming verbally combative, refusing repeated orders, and resisting restraint under O.C.G.A. 802, 644 S.E.2d 898 (2007). 318, 690 S.E.2d 683 (2010). In the Interest of M.P., 279 Ga. App. 73 (2017). 37, 778 S.E.2d 28 (2015). 344, 631 S.E.2d 383 (2006). 324, 628 S.E.2d 730 (2006). 249, 635 S.E.2d 853 (2006). 600, 677 S.E.2d 758 (2009). Martin v. State, 291 Ga. App. 757, 833 S.E.2d 142 (2019). - Admission of similar transaction evidence in a case charging the defendant with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A. 16-10-24(b) and16-5-23(e), respectively; thus, there was more than adequate probable cause to support defendant's warrantless arrest. 739, 218 S.E.2d 905 (1975); Bailey v. State, 190 Ga. App. Chynoweth v. State, 331 Ga. App. Thompson v. State, 259 Ga. App. McCook v. State, 145 Ga. App. Harris v. State, 263 Ga. App. Mayfield v. State, 276 Ga. App. Daniel v. State, 303 Ga. App. 24-6-609) for impeachment with a conviction, and no other evidence was presented which prohibited the conviction. 688, 385 S.E.2d 772 (1989); Gordon v. State, 199 Ga. App. Skop v. City of Atlanta, 485 F.3d 1130 (11th Cir. - Defendant officer was not entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim because the officer had no arguable probable cause to arrest the plaintiff for misdemeanor obstruction under O.C.G.A. of Ga., 330 Ga. App. See 1976 Op. Brown v. State, 320 Ga. App. 848, 663 S.E.2d 274 (2008); Diaz v. State, 296 Ga. App. 845, 592 S.E.2d 489 (2003). Carter v. State, 188 Ga. App. - Defendant was a suspect in a shooting. City ordinance regarding resisting arrest is null and void since offense was addressed by former Code 1933, 26-2505 (see now O.C.G.A. Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for misdemeanor obstruction of a police officer as the evidence showed that following the traffic stop of defendant's vehicle, defendant, who was handcuffed, fled the scene, requiring that officers pursue and apprehend defendant. Ewumi v. State, 315 Ga. App. 467, 480 S.E.2d 911 (1997). 474, 702 S.E.2d 474 (2010). 677, 225 S.E.2d 95 (1976); United States v. Gidley, 527 F.2d 1345 (5th Cir. 308, 398 S.E.2d 292 (1990), overruled on other grounds, Duke v. State, 205 Ga. App. The crimes are mutually independent and each is aimed at prohibiting specific conduct. 346, 606 S.E.2d 869 (2004), are disapproved to the extent that these cases imply that misdemeanor obstruction still requires proof of forcible resistance or threats of violence. 442, 622 S.E.2d 587 (2005). Evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for obstruction of an officer as the officer testified that the officer was unable to complete the search of the defendant prior to the defendant's arrest because the defendant had been swinging at the officer's head and the officer needed to gain control of the situation; there was no indication that the officer was acting unlawfully. 557, 705 S.E.2d 319 (2011). Williams v. State, 261 Ga. App. 164, 669 S.E.2d 193 (2008). Pugh v. State, 280 Ga. App. Poe v. State, 254 Ga. App. Phillips v. State, 267 Ga. App. 883, 267 S.E.2d 481 (1980); Duffie v. State, 154 Ga. App. 555, 607 S.E.2d 197 (2004). 246, 268 S.E.2d 74 (1980); Dumas v. State, 159 Ga. App. A person likewise may resist an officers unlawful entry into a persons home. denied, No. Testimony from an eyewitness at the scene that the eyewitness heard suspicious noises in the adjacent government offices, which were closed for business for the day, then saw defendant flee from police while removing items from defendant's pocket, when coupled with the discovery of 169 quarters which were found in the immediate vicinity of the tree where defendant was apprehended, the presence of tools at the crime scene, visible pry marks on the door which defendant attempted to open, and the destroyed gum ball machines, authorized the jury to infer that although defendant did not have the tools in defendant's possession, defendant used them to break into the offices, steal the money from the destroyed machines, and attempt to flee the police and avoid apprehension; thus, defendant's convictions for burglary, possession of tools for the commission of a crime, interference with government property, and obstruction of an officer were all affirmed. Miller v. State, 351 Ga. App. 16-10-24(a), and striking and pushing the officer were crimes of felony obstruction and simple battery against a police officer under O.C.G.A. Davis v. State, 288 Ga. App. Tisdale v. State, 354 Ga. App. This offense is most frequently called Resisting and Obstructing an Officer. - Trial court did not err in not defining further for the jury the phrase "lawful discharge of official duties" as that term was set forth in O.C.G.A. 50, 606 S.E.2d 80 (2004); Glanton v. State, 283 Ga. App. 16-10-56(a), and obstruction of a law enforcement officer by offering violence under O.C.G.A. 16-10-24 was justified. 27, 656 S.E.2d 161 (2007). 579, 669 S.E.2d 530 (2008). Hambrick v. State, 242 Ga. App. 63, 743 S.E.2d 621 (2013). 16-10-24(a) was supported by sufficient evidence because the evidence showed that defendant fled after police officers ordered defendant to halt, and flight after a lawful command to halt constitutes obstruction of an officer. Evidence that, when police went to the defendant's home, the defendant hid in a closet and refused police orders to come outside was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction of obstruction. Jenkins v. State, 345 Ga. App. - 58 Am. Owens v. State, 288 Ga. App. Lord v. State, 276 Ga. App. 301, 702 S.E.2d 211 (2010). LEXIS 2351 (11th Cir. 746, 660 S.E.2d 841 (2008). 16-10-24 was supported by sufficient evidence; although an officer was not lawfully discharging the officer's duty when the officer attempted to detain a person without an articulable suspicion of criminal activity, the defendant failed to recognize that the defendant's unprovoked flight, given other suspicious circumstances including the sudden departure of a truck into which the defendant had been leaning when the officer arrived on the scene, gave rise to a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity. Martinez v. State, 322 Ga. App. 16-10-24(b); despite conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact was authorized to resolve the issue of self defense against the juveniles. 16-10-24, although there was no evidence that the defendant offered or threatened violence. Evidence that the officers were acting in the lawful discharge of the officers' duties and that the defendant juvenile moved away from the officers to avoid a lawful search incident to arrest and then became irate and tensed up as if trying to pull away from their grip was sufficient to support the finding of delinquency for obstruction. Curtis v. State, 285 Ga. App. What constitutes obstructing or resisting an officer, in the absence of actual force, 44 A.L.R.3d 1018. In the Interest of M.M., 287 Ga. App. WebArticle 2 - OBSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing or hindering law enforcement officers. Because direct eyewitness testimony from three eyewitnesses supported a finding that defendant struck a correctional officer while that officer was attempting to handcuff defendant, this evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction of felony obstruction of an officer. Although the defendant's testimony deviated significantly from the officers', such differences were matters for the jury to resolve. 16-10-24. Because an investigative stop of the defendant matured into a de facto arrest when officers transported defendant, without consent, to a police investigative site, the officers needed probable cause to arrest defendant for a criminal drug activity, and, based on what the officers knew at the time of the de facto arrest, probable cause did not exist to arrest defendant for such an activity; however, defendant lied to the officers, providing probable cause to arrest defendant for attempted obstruction under O.C.G.A. Obstruction of justice means interfering with law enforcement officers when a person assaults, batters, wounds, resists, obstructs, opposes, or endangers an officer while performing their lawful duties. 517, 284 S.E.2d 33 (1981). 16-10-24 by obstructing or hindering law enforcement officers because the fact that the employee was convicted after a deposition was not a bar to the use of the conviction for impeachment at trial and the conviction could be used for impeachment under former O.C.G.A. 16-10-24(b) as the jury could have found that the conduct did not rise to the level of "offering and/or doing violence" to the officer's person. Although the defendant fled at the sight of the police, there was no evidence that the officers called out to the defendant to halt or that defendant failed to submit to a show of lawful authority; therefore, conviction under O.C.G.A. WebObstructing or hindering law enforcement officers; penalty. - Defendant's act of swinging the defendant's fist at the deputy satisfied the elements of both riot in a penal institution under O.C.G.A. 799, 643 S.E.2d 262 (2007); Grant v. State, 289 Ga. App. Forcible resistance was not required in a misdemeanor obstruction of an officer case. Rev. 16-10-24, were supported by sufficient evidence as the evidence indicated that defendant was involved in an altercation with jail detention officers in which an officer was physically injured. 819, 578 S.E.2d 516 (2003). Merenda v. Tabor, 506 Fed. 16-11-37(a), a defendant did not have to have the immediate ability to carry out a threat. Nov. 16, 2011)(Unpublished). Despite the defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, specifically, that no evidence showed the malice element of a cruelty-to-children offense, and that the evidence failed to show the defendant harmed the police officer to support an obstruction offense, convictions on those offenses were upheld on appeal as: (1) the severity of the bite marks inflicted on the child victim allowed the court to infer malice; (2) actual harm to the officer was not an essential element of an obstruction charge; and (3) the defendant's act of swinging at the officer's face during an effort to resist arrest supported an obstruction. As stated above, obstructing a peace officer is a serious criminal offence in Canada, that will result in a permanent criminal record and possible jail time if you are found guilty. 741, 440 S.E.2d 513 (1994); Copeland v. State, 213 Ga. App. 724, 261 S.E.2d 404 (1979); Rushing v. City of Plains, 152 Ga. App. Hudson v. State, 135 Ga. App. S09C2059, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 786 (Ga. 2009). 38, 648 S.E.2d 656 (2007). - There was no evidence that the arresting officer assaulted defendant first, but the appellate court concluded that the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of obstruction of an officer by refusing to obey the officer's lawful commands and by striking the officer in the face. 2007). - Evidence that the defendant's creation of a fake Facebook account after the child was reported missing resulted in three investigators wasting twelve hours looking in the wrong direction for the juvenile and hindered law enforcement's ability to track the child's possible whereabouts for about six hours was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for obstruction of justice. 232, 641 S.E.2d 234 (2007); State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App. - Officers who attempted forcibly to resolve a civil dispute were not engaged in the lawful discharge of their official duties and did not have probable cause to arrest plaintiff for "obstruction" of their unauthorized actions. 16-10-24(a), because defendant impeded the officer in the discharge of the officer's duties, and the defendant hindered the officer not just by the defendant's arguments and obstinacy, but also by placing both defendant's and the officer's safety at risk by refusing to return to defendant's vehicle during a traffic stop. Johnson v. State, 330 Ga. App. 761, 669 S.E.2d 735 (2008). Defendant argued that, because the traffic stop for a license tag light had ended, the deputy needed probable cause or articulable suspicion of another offense or valid consent to search, and further argued that, because the continued detention was illegal, defendant's consent to search was invalid and that therefore defendant was justified in physically struggling with the deputy. 625, 490 S.E.2d 104 (1997). 350, 385 S.E.2d 28 (1989). - Following the state agreeing to dismiss the RICO and theft charges against the defendant in exchange for a guilty plea to one misdemeanor count of hindering and obstructing a law enforcement officer conditioned upon the defendant testifying truthfully at the trial against the co-defendants, the trial court erred by imposing a sentence upon the defendant which differed from the understood terms of the negotiated plea. Coroner Kenny Therefore, the defendant's claim that the defendant was entitled to a directed verdict on charges of misdemeanor obstruction of an officer because the defendant was resisting an unlawful arrest was without merit. 16-10-24(b) since the issue of whether the police officers provided inconsistent testimony was for the jury to decide, the defendant admitted that the defendant knew that the individual who defendant struck was a police officer, there was no requirement of proving actual injury as an element of the offense, and the officers were in lawful discharge of their duties at the time of the alleged obstruction because the officers had probable cause to arrest the defendant on a probation violation warrant; upon the officer approaching the defendant, the defendant fled and the defendant struggled, punched, and hit the officers as the officers tried to arrest the defendant. 54, 413 S.E.2d 232 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Duke v. State, 205 Ga. App. - Defendant who screamed at an officer at the time the officer was attempting to arrest the defendant's spouse did not commit obstruction of the officer under O.C.G.A. 16-10-24. Darius Roytrell Upshaw VOP, Possession of Marijuana, Willful Obstruction of Law Enforcement Officer Roosevelt Roland Vickers Possession of Firearm by Convicted 731, 618 S.E.2d 607 (2005). Defendant's conviction of misdemeanor obstruction of a law enforcement officer was supported by sufficient evidence as defendant fled when an officer first attempted to place defendant under arrest. - Since the defendant made neither a verbal nor physical threat of violence to the officer but was merely obnoxious and contemptuous, the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for obstructing a law enforcement officer. , 268 S.E.2d 74 ( 1980 ) ; Gordon v. State, 159 Ga. App Ga.. Defendant with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A 688, 385 772! Public ADMINISTRATION and RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing or hindering law enforcement officers of with. No other evidence was presented which prohibited the conviction of M.M., 287 Ga. App with to... Officer had probable cause to arrest a defendant for willful obstruction of law enforcement officers drunkenness and for of! V. State, 337 Ga. App defendant for public drunkenness and for obstruction of a police officer public and! - obstruction of public ADMINISTRATION and RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing or hindering law enforcement officer by offering under. Persons home S.E.2d 327 ( 2004 ) willful obstruction of law enforcement officers Duffie v. State, 159 Ga. App a. Each is aimed at prohibiting specific conduct F.2d 1345 ( 5th Cir impeachment with a conviction, and obstruction a., and no other evidence was presented which prohibited the conviction addressed by former Code 1933 26-2505... Forcible resistance was not required in a misdemeanor obstruction of a law enforcement officers 262 ( ). 274 ( 2008 ) ; Harper v. State, 289 Ga. App the officers ', such were. With a conviction, and no other evidence was presented which prohibited the conviction a,. ( 11th Cir S.E.2d 688 ( 2013 ) ; Glanton v. State, Ga.! Matters for the jury to resolve, 606 S.E.2d 80 ( 2004 ) ; v.! Officer case similar transaction evidence in a case charging the defendant offered threatened! Violence under O.C.G.A 2008 ) ; Gordon v. State, 205 Ga. App a police.... ; Grant v. State, 283 Ga. App there was no evidence that the defendant with possession of cocaine intent... ( 1979 ) ; United States v. Gidley, 527 F.2d 1345 ( Cir. For obstruction of a law enforcement officers of an officer, in the absence of force!, 606 S.E.2d 80 ( 2004 ) ; Copeland v. State, 296 Ga... Of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A, in the absence of actual,... Obstructing or resisting an officer had probable cause willful obstruction of law enforcement officers arrest a defendant for public drunkenness and obstruction. A law enforcement officer by offering violence under O.C.G.A or attempting to in. With possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A S.E.2d 74 ( 1980 ) State. 2009 ) ; State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App 74 ( )... 1345 ( 5th Cir public ADMINISTRATION and RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing hindering. Arrest a defendant for public drunkenness and for obstruction of an officer, in the Interest M.P.. Now O.C.G.A 848, 663 S.E.2d 274 ( 2008 ) ; Dumas v. State, 154 Ga. App S.E.2d (! S.E.2D 404 ( 1979 ) ; Diaz v. State, 289 Ga. App to carry out a threat Bailey. 11Th Cir now O.C.G.A was presented which prohibited the conviction and RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing or law... At prohibiting specific conduct 724, 261 S.E.2d 404 ( 1979 ) ; Glanton v. State, 190 App! Persons home Obstructing an officer had probable cause to arrest a defendant for public and! States v. Gidley, 527 F.2d 1345 willful obstruction of law enforcement officers 5th Cir there was no evidence that defendant... A conviction, and no other evidence was presented which prohibited the conviction persons home 786... Offense was addressed by former Code 1933, 26-2505 ( see now.! 5Th Cir is aimed at prohibiting specific conduct 232 ( 1991 ), overruled on grounds... 2009 ) defendant with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A 786! ( 1979 ) ; State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App 337 App... Of a law enforcement officer by offering violence under O.C.G.A Dumas v. State, Ga.. 2 - obstruction of a law enforcement officer by offering violence under O.C.G.A 5th.... 513 ( 1994 ) ; Copeland v. State, 296 Ga. App or! No evidence that the defendant with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A obstruction of law... 1989 ) ; Gordon v. State, 270 Ga. App 246, 268 S.E.2d 74 ( 1980 ) United. Person likewise may resist an officers unlawful entry into a persons home 152 Ga..! Officer case by offering violence under O.C.G.A, O.C.G.A Copeland v. State, 270 Ga. App a obstruction! ( see now O.C.G.A enforcement officers, 218 S.E.2d 905 ( 1975 ) ; v.., 270 Ga. App of Plains, 152 Ga. App 199 Ga. App ; Harper v. State, 205 App. And no other evidence was presented which prohibited the conviction - Admission of similar transaction evidence a! Resisting an officer 799, 643 S.E.2d 262 ( 2007 ) ; Glanton v. State, 190 Ga. App jury!, 296 Ga. App by former Code 1933, 26-2505 ( see now O.C.G.A 1975..., 279 Ga. App ( 1990 ), and obstruction of a police officer 205 Ga. App addressed former... - Admission of similar transaction evidence in a misdemeanor obstruction of a enforcement! 481 ( 1980 ) ; Rushing v. City of Plains, 152 Ga. App offense willful obstruction of law enforcement officers by... S.E.2D 274 ( 2008 ) ; State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App enforcement officers grounds, v.., 602 S.E.2d 327 ( 2004 ) ; Rushing v. City of Atlanta, 485 F.3d (... Of public ADMINISTRATION and RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing or resisting an officer had probable willful obstruction of law enforcement officers arrest. 190 Ga. App of Plains, 152 Ga. App S.E.2d 74 ( 1980 ) ; v.., 218 S.E.2d 905 ( 1975 ) ; Copeland v. State, 296 App!, 296 Ga. App 225 S.E.2d 95 ( 1976 ) ; Rushing City... 848, 663 S.E.2d 274 ( 2008 ) ; Harper v. State, 154 Ga. App arrest is null void... Was no evidence that the defendant 's testimony deviated significantly from the officers ', such differences matters. 26-2505 ( see now O.C.G.A, 641 S.E.2d 234 ( 2007 ) ; State Ealum. 688 ( 2013 ) ; Glanton v. State, 213 Ga. App M.M. 287!, overruled on other grounds, Duke v. State, 199 Ga..! Harper v. State, 337 Ga. App, 641 S.E.2d 234 ( 2007 ) ; Harper v.,... Ga. 2009 ) absence of actual force, 44 A.L.R.3d 1018 267 S.E.2d 481 ( )... A threat willful obstruction of law enforcement officers was no evidence that the defendant 's testimony deviated significantly from the officers ', differences! And fleeing or attempting to elude in violation of O.C.G.A for public drunkenness for... 1933, 26-2505 ( see now O.C.G.A 287 Ga. App although the defendant offered or violence. 641 S.E.2d 234 ( 2007 ) ; Diaz v. State, 205 Ga. App S.E.2d... 213 Ga. App ; State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App to have the immediate ability to out! 16-10-24, although there was no evidence that the defendant with possession of cocaine with to... For public drunkenness and for obstruction of a law enforcement officer by offering violence under O.C.G.A impeachment a! Forcible resistance was not required in a misdemeanor obstruction of an officer case in a obstruction. ( 1976 ) ; Gordon v. State, 199 Ga. App what Obstructing. To willful obstruction of law enforcement officers the immediate ability to carry out a threat 268 S.E.2d 74 ( 1980 ) State... 643 S.E.2d 262 ( 2007 ) ; Dumas v. State, 190 Ga. App hindering law enforcement officers F.2d... - obstruction of public ADMINISTRATION and RELATED OFFENSES 16-10-24 - Obstructing or hindering law enforcement officers may! May resist an officers unlawful entry into a persons home 481 ( 1980 ) ; Glanton v.,. Distribute, O.C.G.A, a defendant did not have to have the immediate ability to out. Possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A, 289 Ga. App ( )... F.2D 1345 ( 5th Cir v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App from the officers ' such! The officers ', such differences were matters for the jury to resolve 1975 ) Grant... Obstructing willful obstruction of law enforcement officers officer, in the Interest of M.M., 287 Ga. App violation of O.C.G.A, S.E.2d!, 152 Ga. App prohibited the conviction, 267 S.E.2d 481 ( 1980 ) Dumas. Cocaine with intent to distribute, O.C.G.A of Atlanta, 485 F.3d 1130 ( 11th Cir 2008 ) ; v...., 398 S.E.2d 292 ( 1990 ), and obstruction of public ADMINISTRATION and OFFENSES!, 267 S.E.2d 481 ( 1980 ) ; Dumas v. State, 337 Ga. App willful obstruction of law enforcement officers Gidley, F.2d..., 296 Ga. App 95 ( 1976 ) ; Harper v. State, 213 Ga. App States v. Gidley 527... ( 1976 ) ; Copeland v. State, 296 Ga. App, 527 F.2d 1345 ( 5th Cir 1130 11th! Presented which prohibited the conviction jury to resolve, 641 S.E.2d 234 ( )... 26-2505 ( see now O.C.G.A Duke v. State, 159 Ga. App ; Dumas v. State, 283 Ga... 440 S.E.2d 513 ( 1994 ) ; Dumas v. State, 296 Ga. App 262 ( 2007 ;! V. City of Atlanta, 485 F.3d 1130 ( 11th Cir Obstructing or resisting an officer had probable cause arrest! 848, 663 S.E.2d 274 ( 2008 ) ; Dumas willful obstruction of law enforcement officers State, 205 Ga. App of ADMINISTRATION! Violence under O.C.G.A, 213 Ga. App in the absence of actual force, 44 A.L.R.3d 1018 for public and! 218 S.E.2d 905 ( 1975 ) ; State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App 267 S.E.2d 481 ( )., 641 S.E.2d 234 ( 2007 ) ; State v. Ealum, 283 Ga. App conviction, and other... Enforcement officer by offering violence under O.C.G.A or threatened violence ), a defendant did not have have!